|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antonio
Meucci
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances on inductive load and its distribution along the line to the care of Eng. Basilio Catania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This figure, extracted to affidavit of the English language Michael Lemmi with drawings and notes of Meucci dated 27 September 1870 [1], recently found at the National Archives in Washington DC [2]
test Antonio Meucci realized that the effects of inductive load of
telephone lines thirty years before the other pioneers of the phone [3-5]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The schemes relate to experiments in long-distance transmission ( "long distance", as is indicated in the drawing No 1). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I
put in the middle of a wire conductor magnetized iron horse, with two
bars, the two poles N and S, joined the conductor - gave me good
satisfaction, but if the driver was copper, rather than iron, I think
it would have been better (to be tested). " |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With reference to drawing No 2, , Meucci noted (re translation from): |
|
|
|
|
" By
doing so will connect the center conductor of a big coil, putting in
the middle of such a finger roll strongly magnetic iron, or put it
before the tube to send with one of the poles, since the other pole in
touch with the earth " |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then, with reference to drawing No 3,Meucci continued: |
|
|
|
|
"The
best method is to place the coil with magnetite - but the horseshoe is
higher - the first of the instrument, which is receiver transmitter in
order to receive electricity land, putting the conduit as shown by
drawing No 4 . It works as if it were helped by galvanic battery. " |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And so concluded, referring to the plan No 4: The four
schemes prove that Meucci had tried, in 1870, a route which, many years
later, was called pupinizzazione of telephone lines. (The
"pupinizzazione" makes it possible to achieve an increase in distance
on equal quality phone, entering along the line, at certain intervals,
appropriate inductances load). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We must
bear in mind that Meucci simulating the long distance with a roll of
wire, and this had necessarily a remarkable capacity distributed and,
therefore, took great advantage of the item inductive load. Note also, in the drawings shown in the figure, the return to earth of the telephone circuit, and in drawing No 4, the subdivision of the inductive load into two parts. It
may be noted that in these drawings, which date back to 1870, the
instruments used by telephone Meucci are shown schematically with their
essentials (electromagnetic, diaphragm and acoustic cavity) encased in a
tube.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There
are two other steps "Memorandum Book" Meucci prior to the earlier
(respectively dated March 7, 1862 and May 20, 1862), but not
accompanied by drawings; they cover the same topic and their
understanding can be facilitated by the ' experiment of 27 September
1870.
In particular, the complaint is the first of March 7, 1862 (p. 1 of the "Memorandum Book"). On
the page number is derived from the Acts of the Bell / Globe [3],
comparing the text of the "Memorandum Book" with Michael affidavit
Lemmi (where the page numbers are not reported).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
his note refers to return to the land of telephone circuits and clarifies the design No 1 of the figure
Here reported. So, in fact, noted Meucci:
"By
combining the two ends of the wire to land, it becomes a good
conductor, taking the power of the earth, and goes long distance.
Estremity ... the two who communicate with a hard metal in the ground,
gave a very excellent result , communicating the power of the earth
from one pole to another, and it is very simple ... "
The
second fact of Meucci (p. 2 of the "Memorandum Book") proves that he
had discovered the advantages of the inductive load since 20 May 1862,
when noted:
"In the middle of
the wire, a strongly magnetized iron protected by a roll does not need
all of battery and is a good conductor of sound.
It
notes that if, as was argued by Judge Wallace, in agreement with the
lawyers of the opposing party to Meucci, the transmission of sound was
made by mechanics, rather than by electricity, the listing of an
inducer halfway line had worsened and not improved the quality of
transmission.
On the other
hand, the expression "conductor sound" was widely used, at the time, as
synonymous with transfer sound (by electricity), so should not be
interpreted as a conductor (mechanical) sound waves.
In
conclusion, since 20 May 1862, Meucci had noted that the quality of the
line loaded inductive was so good that we could do without the
battery, confirming that result with the experiment of 27 September
1870 and further improved by splitting the load . At
the various processes that tend to establish the priorities to the
invention of the telephone, no one realized the importance of Meucci
notes on inductive load, simply because this technique was not known
(See History of using inductive load) .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Affidavit
of Michael Lemmi (Translation of Meucci's Memorandum book, sworn
September
28,
1885.
National
Archives &
Records Administration. College Park, MD-RG60, Year Files Enclosures
1885-6921, Box 10,
Folder 1,
230/3/46/6.
Catania B: An unpublished document reevaluates the work of Antonio Meucci. AEI, vol. AEI, vol. 82, n.2, 1995, p.128- 136. 82, No. 2, 1995, p.128-136.
[3]
Deposition of
Antonio Meucci (New
York, December 7, 1885 - January 1886), edition printed at the New York Public Library - Annex, New York. NY
(USA) and original typescripts and manuscripts at the National Archives
& Records Administration, New York, NY, edition: Records of the US
Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, The American Bell
Telephone Co.. et al. Et al. v. The Globe Telephone Co. V. The Globe Telephone Co.. et al. Et al.
[4] Catania B: Antonio Meucci - requires a revision history. AEI, vol. AEI, vol. 85, n. 85, No 12, 1998, p. 12 1998, P. 906-914. 906-914.
[5]
Catania B: Four
"Firsts" in Telephony
(Letter). ETT , Vol. 10, No. 6, November-December 1999.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|